Futures ResearchQuotes & ChartsFree GuidesBook StoreEducation CenterTrading ToolsResources
Research a BrokerOptions TradingSystem TradingElectronic TradingForex TradingManaged Accounts
Trading Education

Beginners

Trading Education

Online Home Study Courses

Online Library: Books & Guides

Online Seminars

Trading Expectations

Glossary of Terms

Bookstore

"Paper" Trading

Links

Trade Shows & Seminars

FuturEmail

Trading Education

Intermediate

Trading Education

Trading Plan

Using Stop Orders

Markets to Trade

Wisdom of Paper Trading

Turtle Trading

Exchanges

Find a Broker

Trading Education

Advanced

Trading Education
Traders Tax Help
Electronic Trading
Trading Education

Research

Trading Education
Currencies
Energies
Financials
Grains
Indices
Meats
Metals
Softs
Home > Education Center > Traders Tax > IRS Exams

One of the biggest questions asked - other than "How do I make a profit?" - is how do I file my taxes.  As trading filing rules are a little more complex than your simple 1040ez statement, FuturesKnowledge.com has put together a list of informational suggestions with the help of GreenTraderTax.com that should guide you through this process.  Please note - we are not a certified accountant, therefore, you should verify all of your tax questions with either your local or national government offices (AKA: IRS Knows Best!).


IRS Exams [Return to Traders Tax Home Page]
The IRS is turning up the heat on taxpayers in general, including traders.

Recently, the IRS has started to examine more traders, as well as other types of taxpayers. The IRS has a new blessing from Congress to get tough on tax cheats, and Congress needs to raise revenue quickly to balance new budget deficits. Better compliance and enforcement are a key part of their strategy.

In our experience working with more than 1,000 traders around the country, we have noticed some new disturbing trends with the IRS turning up the heat on traders. Specifically, the IRS is auditing more trader tax returns and attempting to deny tax loss deductions (expenses and trading losses) for "money losing traders" and some "part-time traders."

Many traders made a fortune in the markets before 2000, and they paid their fair share of taxes on those gains. The IRS was happy to look upon them in those years as "good tax-paying customers." The markets crashed in early 2000 and the majority of traders gave back all their prior years' gains.

Many traders set their "sole proprietor" businesses up properly with trader tax status and mark-to-market accounting, allowing them by law to carry back their 2000 and 2001 net operating losses to prior tax years. These traders filed Form 1045 NOL refund claim tax returns and many are still expecting to receive large refund checks, plus, interest from the IRS.

Now it seems that some traders are receiving tax notices and/or tax exams instead of tax refund checks.  The IRS is unable to attack the tax law concepts of trader tax status, mark-to-market accounting and net operating loss tax laws. Instead, the IRS is interested in making sure that a taxpayer claiming a large NOL refund is fully entitled by law to use "trader tax status" and "mark-to-market accounting."

For example, the IRS may want to make sure a trader reaches the threshold of qualifying for trader tax status (being in the trading business) vs. merely being an active investor. Investors are not entitled to business deduction treatment and ordinary loss treatment with mark-to-market accounting (MTM). In order to use mark-to-market accounting, which converts capital losses into ordinary losses, a trader must first qualify for "trader tax status." Then, the trader must duly elect MTM on time (by April 15 of the tax year) and also file a timely and proper Form 3115 (Change of Accounting Method). Some traders elected MTM too late and/or filed a late or improper Form 3115.  All these new trader tax laws were not very clear – in fact, some were just updated in March of 2002 (see our 2002 Tax Law Changes page).

See specific IRS attacks on Part-time traders and Money losing traders on those respective pages.

Good news! Check out our new "Advocacy campaign" to seek relief for all traders in dealing with the IRS. We need your help to enact this change. Click here.

An IRS attack on qualification for trader tax status:

One problem is that the IRS itself has generated little useful guidance on the qualification issue. To accommodate the growing questions received from traders, on Nov. 19, 2001, the IRS added a new section to its IRS Publication "Investment Income and Expenses – (Including Capital Gains and Losses) – For Use in Preparing 2001 Returns" titled "Special Rules for Traders in Securities." Unfortunately, this guidance is still lacking and vague; it does not offer concrete objective standards.

Another problem for the IRS is the fact that online trading is basically a virtual business that "sole proprietors" may operate from their home, office or on the road. The IRS seems to be having a hard time understanding the business and respecting it as a real business. The trading business is not a retail store that an IRS agent can visit to see proof of business activity. An active investor may have the same computer and home office set up as someone in the business of trading, and it is hard for the IRS to tell the difference.

Lastly, the IRS seems bent on classifying the buying and selling of securities as an "investment activity" rather than a "business activity." Perhaps, for the IRS, it seems to good to be true that someone can quit their job or have a second job at home, trading for their own account. The IRS figures if you lost money, you don't have a "profit-making intent," which is the key to overcoming the hobby loss rules (see money losing trader page). The fact is that anyone with capital and computer savvy can put themselves in the same position as "professional traders" on Wall Street, which are well-respected by the IRS as being in the business of trading. The IRS is catching up fast on e-commerce, so it's time for their agents to understand new business opportunities on the Internet. Online trading businesses are probably the biggest new Internet trading businesses.

Here’s the bottom line: The IRS has few guidelines for traders, and those that exist are quite vague. Moreover, the IRS has a motive to balk on paying refunds, and it seems bent on not respecting trading as a bona fide business activity.  At every step of the way, we disagree with the IRS in this context. But the IRS has the power to examine traders, and many agents around the country are not experienced in trader tax laws and exams. This combination can lead to trouble for traders being examined.

 


file:///C:/MEDIA_~3/FK_NEW/include/content_vert_right.asp
bkg_green_dark_lt.gif (172 bytes)

Premium Services

Free Weekly Email
Free Monthly Offers

Quotes & Charts
Online Library
Home Study Courses
bkg_green_dark_lt.gif (172 bytes)

Marketplace Links

bkg_green_dark_rt.gif (171 bytes)


bkg_green_dark_lt.gif (172 bytes)

Special Book Offer

bkg_green_dark_rt.gif (171 bytes)

Research and Commentary: Education: Resources:
Currencies Research Indices Research Bookstore Contract Specs
Energies Research Meats Research Free Guides C.O.T. Reports
Financials Research Metals Research Glossary of Terms Exchanges
Grains Research Softs Research Online Course: Intro to Futures Expirations
. . Online Library FuturEmail
Links
Research a Broker: Quotes & Charts
Broker of the Month Online Brokers Contact FuturesKnowledge Ticker Symbols
Discount Brokers Options Brokers About FuturesKnowledge Trade Shows & Seminars
Full Service Brokers Forex Brokers Advertise on FuturesKnowledge Traders Tax Help
Weather Forecasting

DISCLAIMER:  Futures Trading involves a huge risk of financial loss!  FuturesKnowledge.com is a traders research and resource site - and is not meant to be used as a guide for trading.  Due to the large risk involved - we highly recommend that you consult with a number of different resources before attempting to invest in the futures, commodities, options, or any other market we report on.

Copyright © FuturesKnowledge, 2006.   All rights reserved.